APPENDIX C
Notes from the breakout sessions on developing best practices.
Recommended Best Practices
for Pre-Hospital Professionals
Dan Manz, EMS Director, Vermont Department of Health;
Gail F. Cooper, Public
Health Administrator,
County of San Diego Health and Human Services Agency;
Marilyn B. Thompson, RN, CEN, Charge Nurse Emergency Department,
Kootenai
Medical Center, Idaho State Emergency Nurses Council President,
EN CARE Provider;
George F. Rice, Jr., NREMT-P, Deputy Director, Richland
County Emergency Services
- Assess the patient(s) and document for signs and symptoms of alcohol use
problems and assess the environment for alcohol-related risk factors, e.g.,
alcohol bottles or cans at the scene.
(Removed "crash" from the strawman, as it was perceived that the
patient population was broader than alcohol involved drivers. The role of
EMS was discussed as assessing the patient for illness/injury and the
environment for related risks or other observations that will lead to
improved patient management.)
- Report information on Alcohol Use Problems (AUP) to hospital personnel.
(On this point it was agreed that the role of the pre-hospital providers is
to transfer information learned in the pre-hospital environment to the emergency
department staff. The breakout group originally felt that references to
mandatory reporting of alcohol involved crashes should be broadened to a more
generic reference on mandatory reporting in the event reporting laws are
expanded in the future. In follow up discussion, it was agreed that the original
reference to pre-hospital providers following laws regarding mandatory reporting
of unsafe drivers was adequate in that alcohol-related driving is likely to
remain the primary legal obligation.)
- Assist with on scene information and referrals for AUP patients.
- Provide care for the alcohol-impaired patient(s) in a professional and
non-judgmental manner.
("Appropriate" care is assumed and the term was perceived as vague.
"Patient" was expanded to "patient(s)" as alcohol-involved
emergencies may involve multiple patients (e.g., family members, multiple
patient crashes, etc.). "Professional and non-judgmental" was added
during discussion with the larger group in an effort to clarify the medical
approach to the alcohol problem instead of taking a moral tone.)
- Advocate in the community for public education, prevention programs,
public policy, and treatment programs for AUPs.5
Participate in collaborative research, education and data gathering to
improve the care of patients with AUPs.
Integrate alcohol screening and alcohol education into curricula, continuing
education, and standards for emergency health care professionals.
(This point was added given the recognition that the current knowledge base
about management of alcohol-related emergencies is not exhaustive and warrants
further research, education and surveillance.)
Recommended Best Practices for Nurses
Laurie Flaherty, RN, MS, Traffic Safety Consultant,
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, Emergency Nurses Association;
Janet Lassman, RN, BS,
Director of Provider Services,
EN CARE- Emergency Nurses Associations Injury
Prevention Institute;
Mary McCue, RN, CEN, NHTSA Office of Communication and
Outreach;
Benjamin Marett, RN, MSN, CEN, CNA, COHN-S,
President, Emergency Nurses Association,
Clinical Nurse Specialist Emergency Care
Consultants of the Carolinas
- Listen to prehospital professionals’ report and elicit patient
information indicative of AUP.
(Prehospital professionals often have information related to the patient’s
circumstances and surroundings that can be key in identifying an AUP. Listening
for this information and eliciting this information from prehospital
professionals is an important and necessary method of completing a patient
assessment.)
- Identify alcohol-related events in initial assessment of the patient.
(The nurse should use all 5 senses during the initial assessment, and ask the
patient/family/caregiver/EMS professionals direct questions to identify
alcohol-related visits to the ED.)
- Perform an assessment using appropriate tools, such as history, physical
examination, and screening tools.
(Patients with AUP often have specific physical attributes, and can develop
specific chronic health problems related to their AUP. Assessment should include
physical examination and history-taking, looking for the presence of these
signs, symptoms, and chronic physical problems. Assessment should also include
the use of a screening tool to identify patients with AUP, whose AUP may not be
readily apparent, or to assess the extent of the AUP. With multiple other
checklists to perform, and numerous other patient groups to care for, group also
discussed potential reluctance of some emergency nurses to do "one more
thing." Strategies for implementation of assessment tools will have to
address this potential barrier.)
- Document objective findings of assessment, interventions, and plan of care
for patient with AUP.
(All findings of physical exam, history-taking, and screening should be
documented, as well as any interventions that are implemented, and the plan of
care for the patient with AUP. This documentation will serve as a reference for
those rendering care to the patient, once they are transferred or discharged
from the ED.)
- Collaborate with health care team to implement interventions, such as
brief interventions, discharge planning, and referral.
(All aspects of care related to the patient with AUP, such as the use of
screening tools, the use of brief interventions, discharge planning, and
referral for treatment, should be part of an standardized approach, agreed to by
all members of the health care team.)
- Communicate plan of care to appropriate services, such as physicians,
substance abuse counselors, referral agencies, and inpatient caregivers.
(By definition, emergency care is brief, episodic, and crisis-oriented. AUP
and its treatment will not be a resolved issue by the time treatment is
completed in the ED. Therefore, it is imperative to communicate the plan of care
for the AUP to all members of the health care team that will care for the
patient upon discharge or transfer. The goals are a seamless continuum of care
of the AUP, and the patient with an AUP.)
- Provide care for the alcohol-impaired patient(s) in a professional and
non-judgmental manner.
(It is absolutely inappropriate for the health care professional to treat
the patient with an AUP in any way that might be considered judgmental or
unprofessional.)
- Advocate in the community for public education, prevention programs,
public policy, and treatment programs for AUPs.
(Since hospital policy and public policy both have a direct effect on the
nurse, in the nurse’s ability to render comprehensive care to the patient with
AUP, and to find the resources to meet the needs of the patient with AUP, it
behooves the nurse to become actively involved in the hospital and in their
community, to advocate for public education, prevention programs, public policy,
and treatment programs for patients with AUP.)
- Participate in collaborative research, education and data gathering to
improve the care of patients with AUPs.
(As with any other form of health care, research is necessary to ensure
maintenance of the "state of the art." Nurses should conduct and
participate in research to improve identification and care of the patient with
AUP.)
- Integrate alcohol screening and alcohol education into curricula,
continuing education, and standards for emergency health care professionals.
(The knowledge base of health care professionals must be elevated, to include
more information on AUP. Alcohol screening and education regarding comprehensive
care of the patient with AUP should be included in the curricula of nursing
schools, medical schools, residency training, EMS training, continuing education
for practicing nurses, emergency physicians, trauma surgeons, and prehospital
professionals; and should be an established and documented standard of nursing
care, medical care, and prehospital care of the patient with AUP.)
Recommended Best Practices for Physicians
Herbert G. Garrison, MD, MPH, Professor of Emergency Medicine, East Carolina
University;
Sue Nedza, MD, Chair, Alcohol Reporting Task Force,
American College
of Emergency Physicians;
Jeffrey W. Runge, MD, Assistant Chair, Emergency
Medicine and Director,
Carolinas Center for Injury Control, Carolinas Medical
Center;
Phillip Brewer, MD, FACEP, Assistant Professor, Yale University School
of Medicine;
Carl Soderstrom, MD, Professor of Surgery, R. Adams Cowley Shock
Trauma Center,
University of Maryland Medical Center;
Gail D’Onofrio, MS, MD,
Associate Professor, Section of Emergency Medicine,
Yale University School of
Medicine;
Larry M. Gentilello, MD, Associate Professor of Surgery, Harborview Medical Center,
University of Washington School of Medicine
- Physicians should incorporate screening for alcohol use problems (AUPs)
into the routine care of injured patients.
(The use of alcohol as it is related to the health of the patient has always
been an important part of the history obtained by the physician. As part of that
questioning, the physician should routinely include it as part of the patient
assessment, particularly in cases where alcohol use or abuse may have
contributed to the emergency medical condition.)
- Physicians should document history and physical findings consistent with
AUPs
(As the medical record reflects the interaction and care given to a patient,
it is important for the physicians to document the response to the above queries
and to physical examination findings. The group did clearly voiced concerns
about the location of such documentation and the issues about the possible
misuse of this information in the medical record. Should this information be
documented on a separate record? Should it be in a separate record? It was
agreed that there exists a legitimate concern about the possible misuse of this
information if it is accessible to employers or insurers. Attempts should be
made to quantify this risk and to ensure that this does not occur.)
- Physicians should provide for a brief intervention for patients who screen
positive for alcohol use problems.
(Physicians should be active in ensuring that patients who screen positive
receive a brief intervention. The treating physician will not necessarily do
this. For patients who are going to be discharged to home from the ED, it would
ideally be provided immediately in that setting, if such resources are
available. For patients admitted to the hospital, intervention may be provided
as an inpatient service. If this cannot be accomplished prior to discharge, then
intervention should be provided by a physician, or other clinician, during
outpatient follow-up visits. If the patient is referred to a social service
program or setting it might occur at that location. The variability of possible
times, sites and level of the intervention highlights the need for local
policies and procedures specific to that hospital. The type of brief
intervention will also be resource and institution specific.6 This
recommendation emphasizes that the responsibility to act upon screen positive
results for a possible AUP resides with the treating physician. The group
recognized that this is a resource issue that must take into account time and
available treatment options for patients. Physicians should be encouraged to
seek solutions to barriers that preclude treatment that are workable in their
institution and community.)
- Physicians should be aware of state laws and consider the reporting of
alcohol use problems in accordance with these laws.7
(The group recognized the fact that laws exist in many states that govern the
reporting of various medical conditions to specified authorities. In many cases,
physicians are not aware of these requirements or their state or institution may
not have a method in place that will allow for compliance with these laws. This
may be reflected in the forms required for reporting or the availability of
services for after hours reporting. It is imperative that physicians become
knowledgeable about these statutes and be in compliance with them. In addition
if, in the physician’s judgment, the presence of an alcohol abuse problem that
may impair the patient’s ability to drive exists, the physician should
consider initiating this type of report. The group recognized that in many cases
the emergency department physician might not have the skills necessary or time
to make this type of determination with certainty. When there is uncertainty as
to the presence of an AUP, mechanisms should be in place to refer the individual
for a more in-depth evaluation.)
- Provide care for alcohol-impaired patient in a professional and
non-judgmental manner.
(As a profession, the practice of medicine should be held to the highest
standards of practice. Every patient should be treated with respect, with
dignity, and in a non-judgmental manner. This professional behavior should be
stressed in the care of the alcohol-impaired patient. Substance abuse, like
mental illness represents a disease state. The idea that patients who have AUP
are flawed or of poor character should not be tolerated in the practice of
medicine. The group recognized that in many cases this change in attitude and
behavior would require increasing education throughout the medical system and in
the education of emergency physicians, trauma surgeons, nurses and other
clinicians providing care to the injured patients or other patients requiring
emergency medical care. The types of didactic programs about alcohol should be
expanded in scope. In addition, training physicians in methods specifically
designed to aid in the care of these individuals is necessary.)
- Advocate in the community for public education, prevention programs,
public policy, and treatment programs for AUPs.
(Emergency departments and hospitals (including trauma centers) do not exist
in a vacuum. In order to diminish the injuries and illnesses related to AUPs,
physicians must seek solutions outside of their departments. As highly respected
individuals, they can take part in public education programs within the
community.8 In order to impact on many illnesses or disease states, physicians
must take a public health approach and advocate for prevention of
alcohol-related illnesses, including injury. This type of activity can be
modeled after or in coalition with other organizations. Physicians should continue to advocate for changes such as parity for
substance abuse treatment benefits by health plans. They should also play an
active role in the development and monitoring of laws that effect their
treatment of these patients. Finally, many communities have little to no
resources for treating those individuals who screen positive for alcohol use
problems, or for those who seek treatment options. This is especially true for
the Medicaid and uninsured population. The screening of these individuals
without the availability of treatment solutions will seriously impact on the
success of these efforts. It may also discourage practitioners from screening.
It is important that physicians, nurses and other clinicians advocate for the
funding and support of these urgently needed programs.)
- Participate in collaborative research, education and data gathering to
improve the care of patients with AUPs.
(Validation and acceptance of treatment practices requires data based on
clinical research. A first step must be to conduct research efforts to document
that identifying and treating patients with AUPs leads to reductions in
alcohol-related illness and social consequences.)
- Integrate alcohol screening and alcohol education into curricula,
continuing education, and standards for emergency health care professionals.9
(As mentioned previously, it is important to change the culture of caring for
patients with AUPs. Physicians must advocate for increasing education for our
colleagues already in practice and for those in the foundational stages of their
training. This is not limited to physicians engaged in the practice of emergency
medicine or trauma surgery but to all providers who care for these patients.10
Physicians who directly interface with other groups such as EMS personnel and
nursing personnel should advocate for this education in their curriculum.)
- Community - this might be a medical community in which they practice, the community in which their hospital is situated, or the broader community of their medical specialty. This can even be expanded to the American community as a whole.
- Examples of tool include: TWEAK, CAGE
- For those patients who cannot operate a motor vehicle safely
- Community - this might be a medical community in which they practice, the community in which their hospital is situated, or the broader community of their medical specialty. This can even be expanded to the American community as a whole.
- For example, trauma surgeons.
- physicians such as internists, pediatricians, and primary care specialists.