banner of Connecticut's 2003 Impaired Driving High-Visibility Enforcement Campaign

Tables and Figures

Figure1. Connecticut Number of Alcohol-Related Fatalities From 1992-2002

Table 1.  Typical Holiday Campaign and Sustained Activities and Evaluation Efforts

Table 2.  Connecticut Telephone Survey Q27: Self–Reported Gender by Survey Administration

Table 3.  Connecticut Telephone Survey Q29: Self–Reported Race by Survey Administration

Table 4.  Connecticut Telephone Survey Q28: Self-Reported Age Group by Survey Administration

Table 5. Connecticut Telephone Survey Q3: Self-Reported Type of Vehicle Driven Most by Respondent

Table 6.  Connecticut Telephone Survey Q21 and Q22: Had Seen or Heard Something About Impaired Driving in Connecticut and the Source of What They Had Seen or Heard

Table 7.  Connecticut Telephone Survey Q16: Had Seen or Heard About Checkpoints in Past 30 Days Where Police Looking for Alcohol-Impaired Drivers

Table 8.  Connecticut Telephone Survey Responses of Men 21 to 34 for Q21 and Q22: Had Seen or Heard Something About Impaired Driving in Connecticut and the Source of What They Had Seen or Heard

Table 9.  Connecticut Telephone Survey Responses of Men 21 to 34 for Q16: Had Seen or Heard About Checkpoints in Past 30 Days Where Police Looking for Alcohol-Impaired Drivers

Table 10.  Connecticut Telephone Survey Q14 and Q15: Public Perception of the Strictness of Local And State Police Enforcement of Drinking and Driving Laws

Table 11.  Connecticut Telephone Survey Responses of Men 21 to 34 for Q14 and Q15: Public Perception of the Strictness of Local and State Police Enforcement of Drinking and Driving Laws

Table 12.  Connecticut Telephone Survey Q13: Public Perception of Police Presence on the Road

Table 13.  Connecticut Telephone Survey Responses of Men 21 to 34 for Q13: Public Perception of Police Presence on the Road

Table 14.  Connecticut Telephone Survey Q8: Perceived Likelihood of Being Stopped by Police if You Drove After Drinking Too Much to Drive Safely

Table 15.  Connecticut Telephone Survey Q9: Perceived Likelihood of a Driver Being Stopped by Police if The Driver Had Been Drinking

Table 16.  Connecticut Telephone Survey Responses of Men 21 to 34 for Q9:  Perceived Likelihood of a Driver Being Stopped by Police if the Driver Had Been Drinking

Table 17.  Connecticut Telephone Survey Q10: Self-Reported Drinking and Driving Compared to Last Year

Table 18.  Connecticut Telephone Survey Q11:  Reported Knowing Other People Drinking and Driving Compared to Last Year

Table 19.  Connecticut Telephone Survey Responses of Men 21 to 34 for Q11: Reported Knowing Other People Drinking and Driving Compared to Last Year

Table 20.  Connecticut Telephone Survey Q5: Reported Having Driven in the Past 30 Days Within Two Hours of Drinking an Alcoholic Beverage

Table 21.  Connecticut Telephone Survey Responses of Men 21 to 34 for Q5: Reported Having Driven in the Past 30 Days Within Two Hours of Drinking an Alcoholic Beverage

Table 22.  Connecticut Telephone Survey Q17 and Q18: Reported Having Gone Through or Knowing Someone Who Went Through a Sobriety Checkpoint in Past 30 Days

Table 23.  Connecticut Telephone Survey Responses of Men 21 to 34 for Q17 and Q18: Reported Having Gone Through or Knowing Someone Who Went Through a Sobriety Checkpoint in Past 30 Days

Table 24.  Connecticut Telephone Survey Q20:  Reported Being Stopped for Driving While Intoxicated or Impaired

Table 25.  Connecticut Survey Responses of Men 21 to 34 for Q20:  Reported Being Stopped for Driving While Intoxicated or Impaired

Table 26.  Connecticut Roadside Survey: Whether and Where in the Past Month Respondents Had Seen, Heard, or Read About Any Special Police Efforts to Enforce the Law Against Drinking and Driving

Table 27.  Connecticut Roadside Survey: Driver BACs and Refusals

Table 28.  Connecticut Roadside Survey: Breath Test Refusal Rates

Table 29.  Connecticut Roadside Survey:  Men 16 to 34 Driver BACs and Refusals

Table 30.  Connecticut Roadside Survey: Men 16 to 34 Breath Test Refusal Rates

Table 31.  Connecticut Roadside Survey: Distribution of Roadside BACs by Category and Hour of Night

Table 32.  Connecticut Roadside Survey: Distribution of BACs by Age Group

Table 33.  Connecticut Roadside Survey: Proportion of Drivers at Checkpoints by Age Group and Hour of Night

Table 34.  Connecticut Roadside Survey: Distribution of BACs by Gender

Table 35.  Connecticut Alcohol-Related Fatality Trend ARIMA Results: Parameter Estimates for Alcohol-Related Fatalities

Table 36.  Connecticut Alcohol-Related Fatality Trend ARIMA Results Including Covariate: Parameter Estimates for Alcohol-Related Fatalities Using Alcohol-Related Fatalities From Contiguous Counties as a Covariate

Figure 2.  Connecticut Predicted Alcohol-Related Fatalities 2000-2004 After Contiguous County Data and Modeling Applied to Remove Noise and the Effects of Region Wide Efforts to Combat Drinking and Driving as Well as Seasonal and Economic Variations

Table 37.  Connecticut Alcohol-Related Fatality Trend Involving Men 21 to 34 Years Old ARIMA Results: Parameter Estimates for Alcohol-Related Fatalities

Top