Section 2. Personal protective equipment

Overview

Even the best-trained and most safety-conscious motorcyclists may be involved in a crash. If they are, motorcycle helmets and other personal protective equipment provide their only defense against injury. Helmets meeting the FMVSS 218 standard are highly effective in reducing head and brain injuries (see Liu et al. [2003] for a comprehensive review of the evidence). Helmets with face shields also protect riders’ eyes from wind and foreign objects. Well-constructed jackets, pants, boots, and gloves can prevent abrasions and bruises. If made of impact-resistant material, they may prevent arm and leg fractures or serious torso and spinal cord injuries.

As of 2006, 20 States require all motorcyclists to wear helmets and most other States require motorcyclists under the age of 18 or 21 to wear helmets. Thirty-six States require some form of eye protection. While helmets have received the most attention and produced the most controversy, protective equipment may be most effectively considered and marketed as a total package.

Helmets are the only personal protective equipment item regulated by the Federal government and for which use data are available. Forty-eight percent of all riders observed in NHTSA’s 2005 nationwide survey wore FMVSS 218-compliant helmets, down from 71 percent in 2000. An additional 9 percent wore non-compliant helmets. FMVSS 218 helmet use was 67 percent in States with helmet use laws covering all riders compared to 38 percent in other States (Glassbrenner, 2005).

Objective: Increase the number of motorcyclists who wear FMVSS 218-compliant helmets and other personal protective equipment.

Strategy 2.1: Education – Educate motorcyclists about the benefits of FMVSS 218-compliant helmets and other protective equipment.

The benefits of personal protective equipment are well-established through solid and unbiased research. This information should be communicated to motorcyclists in an unbiased way, through channels that motorcyclists will understand and trust.

Action steps:

  • Coordinate efforts among State motorcycle safety administrators, highway safety offices, rider groups, and others to develop campaigns and messages that motorcyclists will understand and believe.

  • Distribute communications through rider groups, law enforcement officers, rider media, dealers, local news, and other means.

  • Encourage States with helmet laws covering all motorcyclists to erect signs at State borders reminding motorcyclists to wear helmets.

Promising practices:

  • In several States, motorcycle safety program staff and trainers provide a consistent example by always wearing appropriate protective equipment when riding and by promoting the value of this equipment. Examples include California, New Mexico (contact the New Mexico Motorcycle Safety Program at davidfsmith4@comcast.net), Oregon (contact Team Oregon at team.oregon@oregonstate.edu.), and Pennsylvania.

  • California’s posters (see Section 1.1) also promoted proper personal protective gear.

Resources and supporting activities:

Strategy 2.2: Promotion – Promote protective equipment through rider groups, motorcycle organizations, dealers, and motorcycle manufacturers.

Some motorcyclists may be discouraged from using protective equipment by peer pressure. Rider groups that endorse individual freedoms can respect and support riders who choose to wear proper gear. Manufacturers can incorporate proper gear into their total brand package.

Action steps:

  • Rider groups endorse proper protective gear and encourage members to wear proper gear.

  • Motorcycle manufacturers and dealers promote the use of proper protective gear.

Promising practices:

  • Dealers promote proper gear when selling a motorcycle.

  • Manufacturers promote protective equipment through product advertising.

Resources and supporting activities:

  • MSF provides the information documents “Personal Protective Gear” and “How Helmets Work” at www.msf-usa.org.

  • GWRRA encourages the use of personal protective gear, including helmets (www.gwrra.org/officers/, MADPlaybook, Sec. VI-c).

  • AMA “has always encouraged the use of helmets, gloves, sturdy footwear, and protective garments in general, as part of a comprehensive motorcycle safety program to help reduce injuries and fatalities in the event of a motorcycle accident” (www.amadirectlink.com/legisltn/positions/helmet.asp).

  • NHTSA will implement an outreach program directed at motorcycle helmet manufacturers through which it will attend trade show events to conduct field inspections of helmets and provide information about FMVSS 218 requirements and procedures.

Strategy 2.3: Noncompliant helmets – Increase the use of FMVSS 218-compliant helmets through education and promotion.

Some motorcycle helmets do not meet the performance standards of FMVSS 218. In NHTSA’s 2005 national survey, almost one-sixth of the helmets observed on the road were noncompliant helmets. These noncompliant helmets provide little or no protection. Motorcyclists should know the facts about noncompliant helmets and be able to determine if a helmet is noncompliant. Many State helmet laws require helmets to comply with FMVSS 218.

Action steps:

  • Communicate to motorcyclists the benefits of FMVSS 218-compliant helmets and how they can be identified.

  • Educate law enforcement on how to identify noncompliant helmets and encourage them to cite noncompliant helmet wearers in States requiring FMVSS 218-compliant helmets.

Promising practices:

  • Some dealers have conducted a “beanie buy-back” program where riders who turn in a noncompliant helmet receive a discount on a FMVSS 218-compliant helmet.

  • Many State motorcycle safety programs have cross-section examples of compliant and noncompliant helmets on display at training sites.

In 2005, West Virginia added noncompliant helmet information to the annual State Police in-service training. Officers learned how to identify noncompliant helmets through discussion, printed material, and examples of noncompliant and FMVSS 218-compliant helmets.

Resources and supporting activities:

  • NHTSA is considering amending FMVSS 218 to make it easier to confirm that a helmet complies with the standard.

  • NHTSA is developing a video that will be viewable on its Web site in Spring 2007 to assist consumers on how to determine whether a motorcycle helmet fits them properly and how to identify whether their motorcycle helmet is compliant with FMVSS 218.

References and notes for Section 2, Personal protective equipment

NAMS recommendations for States and communities on personal protective equipment
31. Use effective strategies to increase the use of FMVSS 218-compliant helmets.
32. Educate motorcyclists about the value of protective apparel by providing an information source on related research and a forum for the exchange of information.
33. Find ways to more effectively communicate the benefits of helmet use and work toward making voluntary use of FMVSS 218-compliant helmets more widely accepted.
34. Use effective strategies to ensure that all helmets in use meet FMVSS 218.

General references on personal protective equipment