| Technical Report Documentation Page | ||||||||
1. Report No. DOT HS 810 650 |
2. Government Accession No. |
3. Recipients Catalog No. |
||||||
4. Title and Subtitle UNCONSCIOUS MOTIVATORS AND SITUATIONAL SAFETY BELT USE |
5. Report Date August 2006 |
|||||||
6. Performing Organization Code |
||||||||
7. Author(s) |
8. Performing Organization Report No. |
|||||||
9. Performing Organization Name and Address The Media Network, Inc. |
10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) |
|||||||
11. Contract or Grant No. DTNH 22-04-P-05230 |
||||||||
12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Office of Research and Technology |
13. Type of Report and Period Covered NHTSA Technical Report |
|||||||
14. Sponsoring Agency Code |
||||||||
15.
Supplementary Notes |
||||||||
16. Abstract Despite the overwhelming evidence that safety belts save lives, millions of Americans still do not buckle up every time they are in a motor vehicle. A small proportion of these people never wear safety belts, but the vast majority are “situational safety belt users,” wearing a belt only when they think it is necessary. NHTSA researchers hypothesized that these part-time wearers use unconscious defense mechanisms (i.e., repression, denial, rationalization, and fatalism) to suppress conscious thought of the consequences of being in a crash. To explore whether unconscious defense mechanisms are an appropriate intervention point to encourage the full-time use of belts, NHTSA commissioned a literature review and expert panel meeting on the role of unconscious motivators in response to safety threats. The literature review suggested increased mindfulness, enhanced efficacy, increasing the social desirability of compliance, disrupting resistance, and encouraging anticipatory regret as ways to overcome unconscious motivators. The expert panel suggested the following techniques: reframe personal control, reframe the reason for wearing belts (e.g., make it unrelated to safety), reframe the perception of who wears belts, use indirect messages which are nonthreatening, and recognize the factors that make belt wearing a unique behavior. Both portions of this research suggest that unconscious motivators play an important role in situational belt wearing, and offer suggestions for how to address these unconscious motivators at a mass level to encourage full-time belt wearing. However, the particular combination of strategies to achieve favorable outcomes is highly dependent on: (1) which unconscious motivators are at work, and (2) the population exhibiting the behavior targeted for change. Additional research on these two issues is recommended. |
||||||||
17. Key Words safety belts; seatbelts; unconscious motivators; defense mechanisms; behavior change; attitudes and beliefs; risk perception; risk communication; repression; denial; rationalization; fatalism |
18. Distribution Statement This document is available to the public through the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161. |
|||||||
19. Security Classif. (Of this report) |
20. Security Classif. (Of this page) |
21. No. of Pages 62 |
22. Price |
|||||
| Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72) Reproduction of completed page authorized | ||||||||