License Reinstatement and Subsequent Driving Record


Cover Page

Technical Report

Technical Summary

Acknowledgements

List of Tables

Introduction

Study Sites

Observational Study

Focus Group Research

Conclusions

References

 

Table 3.4 summarizes the information placed on subjects' driving records after the DWI/OWI arrest. This information is based on the most recent abstract obtained for each subject. For subjects who were eligible for license reinstatement at the end of their DWI/OWI suspension, a driver abstract was obtained one to two months after the DWI/OWI suspension ended. For subjects who were not eligible for reinstatement, only a single driver abstract was obtained one to five months after their conviction.

Twenty-three Milwaukee subjects (40 percent) were eligible for license reinstatement, and 3 subjects (5 percent) had their license reinstated. As noted previously, 2 Bergen County subjects had license suspensions for other traffic convictions when they were arrested for DWI. However, the termination dates for these suspensions were not indicated on the driver abstracts and, thus, it could not be determined whether these offenders would have been eligible for reinstatement at the end of the DWI suspension. Therefore, a second abstract was obtained for all 36 Bergen County subjects to determine whether and when reinstatement had occurred. Twenty-eight Bergen County subjects (78 percent) had their license reinstated.





Table 3.4: Observational Study Subjects:

License Reinstatement and

Post-DWI/OWI Violations and Suspensions

 

Percent of Subjects

 

Milwaukee

(n=57)

Bergen County

(n=36)

Reinstatement after DWI/OWI Suspension

 

 

Ineligible

59.6

0.0

Reinstated

5.3

77.8

Eligible but Did Not Reinstate

35.1

22.2

Suspensions after DWI/OWI Arrest

 

 

None

15.8

80.6

1

42.1

5.6

2

31.6

8.3

> 3

10.6

5.6

Violations after DWI/OWI Arrest

 

 

Yes

7.0

8.3

No

93.0

91.7

Based on the most recent driver abstract obtained for each subject, most Milwaukee subjects received additional license suspensions after the alcohol-impaired driving arrest, but most Bergen County subjects did not. As previously noted, for the 34 Milwaukee subjects ineligible for reinstatement, the information in Table 3.4 reflects only the initial driver abstract obtained one to five months after their conviction. Thus, this information almost certainly understates the extent to which Milwaukee subjects continued to accrue suspensions. All but 9 of the 57 Milwaukee subjects (84 percent) received at least one subsequent suspension, and 24 subjects (42 percent) received two or more suspensions. Almost all these suspensions were related to the OWI conviction and were due either to failure to comply with the alcohol assessment interview or to pay the fine. Of the subsequent suspensions, 5 were based on driving while suspended/revoked or a revoked registration.

In Bergen County, 7 of the 36 subjects (19 percent) received at least one additional license suspension following the DWI incident. These suspensions were usually related to failure to pay fines or fees, including the insurance surcharge. For 2 subjects, the suspension was based on a conviction for driving while suspended. In general, the Bergen County subjects had less problematic driver records than the Milwaukee subjects, but there were notable exceptions.

For example, one Bergen County subject had 16 suspensions imposed after the DWI arrest and another subject had 10 subsequent suspensions. All but one of the Bergen County subjects who did not have their license reinstated also did not pay the alcohol program fee.