Relative Impact of Sanctions |
![]() |
|
Most participants in both sites had difficulty segregating and ranking the impact of the various sanctions. In both sites, the majority of participants said the worst sanction was the emotional and psychological consequences of the experience. Many participants spoke eloquently about the shame and humiliation of having been arrested, and many described their efforts to hide the arrest from their employers and acquaintances. A number of participants in both sites also mentioned the financial costs. The insurance surcharge was the cost most reviled by New Jersey participants. The participants reported that it is widely perceived as a "sin tax," which is imposed primarily to raise revenue for the state. The perception was that little money is used to make insurance available through the assigned risk pool. Four of the 16 Milwaukee participants said that the license suspension was the worst part of their sentences. Even though the six-month hard suspension (with no occupational license) caused significant lifestyle adjustments for many New Jersey participants, only seven of the 21 New Jersey participants said that the suspension was the worst sanction. Many Milwaukee residents found fault with the alcohol assessment process.
These participants complained that the assessment, which cost $180,
was superficial and brief. Many New Jersey participants complained about
the IDRC's power to require completion of expensive One New Jersey man felt that the worst sanction was the loss of his
car. His DWI arrest occurred in New York City, and his car was seized
"as if I had been a big-time drug dealer." He still owed car
payments for two years, but had no car to drive. |